Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/6751
Tipo de documento
ArtigoDireito Autoral
Acesso restrito
Coleções
Metadata
Mostrar registro completo
MIDGUT EPITHELIAL RESPONSES OF DIFFERENT MOSQUITO-PLASMODIUM COMBINATIONS: THE ACTIN CONE ZIPPER REPAIR MECHANISM IN AEDES AEGYPTI
Autor(es)
Afiliação
Colorado State University. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology. Fort Collins, CO, USA / National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Mosquito Immunity and Vector Competence Unit. Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research. Rockville, MD, USA.
Colorado State University. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology. Fort Collins, CO, USA / National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Mosquito Immunity and Vector Competence Unit. Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research. Rockville, MD, USA.
Colorado State University. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology. Fort Collins, CO, USA / National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Mosquito Immunity and Vector Competence Unit. Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research. Rockville, MD, USA
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou. Laboratory of Medical Entomology. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Colorado State University. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology. Fort Collins, CO, USA / National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Mosquito Immunity and Vector Competence Unit. Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research. Rockville, MD, USA.
Colorado State University. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology. Fort Collins, CO, USA / National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Mosquito Immunity and Vector Competence Unit. Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research. Rockville, MD, USA.
Colorado State University. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology. Fort Collins, CO, USA / National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Mosquito Immunity and Vector Competence Unit. Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research. Rockville, MD, USA
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou. Laboratory of Medical Entomology. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Colorado State University. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology. Fort Collins, CO, USA / National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Mosquito Immunity and Vector Competence Unit. Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research. Rockville, MD, USA.
Resumo em Inglês
In vivo responses of midgut epithelial cells to ookinete invasion of three different vector–parasite combinations, Aedes aegypti–Plasmodium gallinaceum, Anopheles stephensi–Plasmodiumberghei, and A. stephensi–P. gallinaceum, were directly compared by using enzymatic markers and immunofluorescence stainings. Our studies indicate that, in A. Aegypti and A. stephensiookinetes traverse the midgut via an intracellular route and inflict irreversible damage to the invaded cells. These two mosquito species differ, however, in their mechanisms of epithelial repair. A. stephensidetaches dam-aged cells by an actin-mediated budding-off mechanism when invaded by either P. berghei or P. gallinaceum. In A. aegypti, the midgut epithelium is repaired by a unique actin cone zipper mechanism that involves the formation of a cone-shaped actin aggregate at the base of the cell that closes sequentially, expelling the cellular contents into the midgut lumen as it brings together healthy neighboring cells. Invasion of A. Stephensiby P. Berghei induced expression of nitric oxide synthase and peroxidase activ-ities, which mediate tyrosine nitration. These enzymes and nitro-tyrosine, however, were not induced in the other two vector–parasite combinations examined. These studies indicate that the epithelial responses of different mosquito–parasite combinations are not universal. The implications of these observations to vali-date animal experimental systems that reflect the biology of natural vectors of human malarias are discussed
Compartilhar