Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/56947

Tipo de documento
Artigo
Direito Autoral
Acesso aberto
Coleções
Compartilhar

Estatísticas
Metadata
Mostrar registro completo

MAPPING THE TUBERCULOSIS SCIENTIFIC LANDSCAPE AMONG BRICS COUNTRIES: A BIBLIOMETRIC AND NETWORK ANALYSIS
Castor, Kamaiaji et al. | Data do documento: 2020
Autor(es)
Castor, Kamaiaji
Mota, Fabio Batista
Silva, Roseli Monteiro da
Cabral, Bernardo Pereira
Maciel, Ethel Leonor
Almeida, Isabela Neves de
Arakaki-Sanchez, Denise
Andrade, Kleydson Bonfim
Testov, Vadim
Vasilyeva, Irina
Zhao, Yanlin
Zhang, Hui
Singh, Manjula
Rao, Raghuram
Tripathy, Srikanth
Gray, Glenda
Padayatchi, Nesri
Bhagwandin, Niresh
Swaminathan, Soumya
Kasaeva, Tereza
Kritski, Afrânio
Afiliação
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Presidência. Centro de Estudos Estratégicos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Presidência. Centro de Estudos Estratégicos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Presidência. Centro de Estudos Estratégicos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Presidência. Centro de Estudos Estratégicos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo. Laboratório de Epidemiologia. Vitória, ES, Brasil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Faculdade de Medicina. Laboratório de Pesquisa em Micobactérias. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Ministério da Saúde. Programa Nacional de Controle da Tuberculose. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Ministério da Saúde. Programa Nacional de Controle da Tuberculose. Brasília, DF, Brasil.
National Medical Research Centre of Pthtisiopulmonology and Infection Diseases. Moscow, Russian Federation.
National Medical Research Centre of Pthtisiopulmonology and Infection Diseases. Moscow, Russian Federation.
National Centre for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention. Beijing, China.
National Centre for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention. Beijing, China.
Indian Council of Medical Research. New Delhi, India.
Government of India. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Central TB Division. New Delhi, India.
National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis. Chennai, India.
University of KwaZulu-Natal. Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, South African Medical Research Council HIV–TB Pathogenesis and Treatment Research Unit. Congella, South Africa.
University of KwaZulu-Natal. Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, South African Medical Research Council HIV–TB Pathogenesis and Treatment Research Unit. Congella, South Africa.
University of KwaZulu-Natal. Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, South African Medical Research Council HIV–TB Pathogenesis and Treatment Research Unit. Congella, South Africa.
Central TB Research Institute. Phthisiology. Moscow, Russian Federation / World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Faculdade de Medicina, Programa Acadêmico de Tuberculose. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Resumo em Inglês
Background The five BRICS (Brazil, Russian, Indian, China, and South Africa) countries bear 49% of the world’s tuberculosis (TB) burden and they are committed to ending tuberculosis. Objectives The aim of this paper is to map the scientific landscape related to TB research in BRICS countries. Methods Were combined bibliometrics and social network analysis techniques to map the scientific publications related to TB produced by the BRICS. Was made a descriptive statistical data covering the full period of analysis (1993-2016) and the research networks were made for 2007-2016 (8,366 records). The bubble charts were generated by VantagePoint and the networks by the Gephi 0.9.1 software (Gephi Consortium 2010) from co-occurrence matrices produced in VantagePoint. The FruchtermanReingold algorithm provided the networks’ layout. Findings During the period 1993-2016, there were 38,315 peer-reviewed, among them, there were 11,018 (28.7%) articles related by one or more authors in a BRICS: India 38.7%; China 23.8%; South Africa 21.1%; Brazil 13.0%; and Russia 4.5% (The total was greater than 100% because our criterion was all papers with at least one author in a BRICS). Among the BRICS, there was greater interaction between India and South Africa and organisations in India and China had the highest productivity; however, South African organisations had more interaction with countries outside the BRICS. Publications by and about BRICS generally covered all research areas, especially those in India and China covered all research areas, although Brazil and South Africa prioritised infectious diseases, microbiology, and the respiratory system. Main Conclusions An overview of BRICS scientific publications and interactions highlighted the necessity to develop a BRICS TB research plan to increase efforts and funding to ensure that basic science research successfully translates into products and policies to help end the TB epidemic.
Palavras-chave em inglês
Tuberculosis
Scientific landscape
BRICS
Bibliometrics
Research network analysis
 
Editor
Fiocruz/IOC
Referência
Castor, Kamaiaji et al. Mapping the tuberculosis scientific landscape among BRICS countries: a bibliometric and network analysis. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, v. 115, p. 1-8, 2020.
DOI
10.1590/0074-02760190342
ISSN
0074-0276