Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/3799
Tipo
ArtículoDerechos de autor
Acceso abierto
Colecciones
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
PERIDOMESTIC RISK FACTORS FOR CANINE LEISHMANIASIS IN URBAN DWELLINGS: NEW FINDINGS FROM A PROSPECTIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL.
Leishmaniose
Criação de Animais Domésticos
Animais
Cruzamento
Galinhas
Estudos de Coortes
Reservatórios de Doenças
Feminino
Incidência
Estudos Prospectivos
Fatores de Risco
Suínos
Saúde da População Urbana
Autor
Afiliación
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas Gonçalo Moniz. Salvador, BA, Brasil.
Associação Obras Sociais Irmã Dulce. Salvador, BA, Brasil.
University of California. Epidemiology and Public Health Biology. Berkeley. California, USA.
Hospital São Rafael. Salvador, BA, Brasil.
University of California. Epidemiology and Public Health Biology. Berkeley. California, USA.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas Gonçalo Moniz. Salvador, BA, Brasil.
Associação Obras Sociais Irmã Dulce. Salvador, BA, Brasil.
University of California. Epidemiology and Public Health Biology. Berkeley. California, USA.
Hospital São Rafael. Salvador, BA, Brasil.
University of California. Epidemiology and Public Health Biology. Berkeley. California, USA.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas Gonçalo Moniz. Salvador, BA, Brasil.
Resumen en ingles
Despite the wealth of information on the prevalence and correlates of canine Leishmania infection (CLI), data on its incidence are still sparse, and little is known regarding risk factors for CLI. We studied a cohort of dogs in an urban area in Brazil to determine whether incidence varied with age, breed, and environmental characteristics. The mean follow-up was 1.5 years, and the crude incidence rate was 11.8 cases/100 dog-years (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8.6-15.6). In the multivariate analysis, short fur was the strongest predictor of CLI (relative risk [RR] = 9.4). In addition, our data indicate that raising pigs (RR = 4.1), chickens (RR = 3.3), or other livestock (RR = 2.6) significantly increased the risk of CLI. Thus, suggesting control measures directed towards modifying the environmental factors favoring contact between vectors, reservoirs, and susceptible humans, such as proximity to pigpens or hen houses. Furthermore, conventional control programs of insecticidal spraying of human dwellings should also apply insecticide in and around animal sheds.
DeCS
Doenças do CãoLeishmaniose
Criação de Animais Domésticos
Animais
Cruzamento
Galinhas
Estudos de Coortes
Reservatórios de Doenças
Feminino
Incidência
Estudos Prospectivos
Fatores de Risco
Suínos
Saúde da População Urbana
Compartir