Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/10792
Tipo
ArtículoDerechos de autor
Acceso restringido
Colecciones
- INI - Artigos de Periódicos [3460]
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
A SIMULATION STUDY INTO THE PERFORMANCE OF ‘‘OPTIMAL’’ DIAGNOSTIC THRESHOLDS IN THE POPULATION: ‘‘LARGE’’ EFFECT SIZES ARE NOT ENOUGH
Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
Epidemiologic Research Design
Computer Simulation
Técnicas e Procedimentos Diagnósticos
Projetos de Pesquisa Epidemiológica
Simulação por Computador
Afiliación
Children’s Hospital. German Pediatric Pain Center. Datteln, Germany / Witten/Herdecke University. Children’s Pain Therapy and Paediatric Palliative Care. Datteln, Germany
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em Doença de Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em Doença de Chagas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
Resumen en ingles
Objectives: Many diagnostic studies are aimed at defining ‘‘optimal’’ thresholds. Here, we evaluate the performance of empirically
defined optimal thresholds (1) in the sample in which they were defined and (2) in the population from which the sample was drawn.
Study Design and Setting: We simulated test results for 120,000 samples varying the number of people without a disease (n between
20 and 500), number of people with a disease (m between 20 and 500), the magnitude of the difference between group means [effect size
(ES) between 0.5 and 4], and distributions (normal and log-normal). The thresholds associated with the maximal Youden index were
defined as optimal. Performance was defined as the percentage of correct classifications in the sample and when applied to the whole
population.
Results: At the population level, the thresholds defined for the four ESs (0.5, 0.8, 2, and 4) yielded a median of 59%, 65%, 83%, and
97% correct classifications, respectively. At the sample level, the samples with similar characteristics yielded widely varying estimates of
the performance that were systematically higher than at the population level.
Conclusion: Researchers need to be careful defining cut points for mean differences that are traditionally considered ‘‘large’’
(ES 5 0.8). The diagnostic utility of optimal thresholds needs to be assessed in prospective studies. 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights
reserved.
Palabras clave en ingles
Sensitivity and SpecificityDiagnostic Techniques and Procedures
Epidemiologic Research Design
Computer Simulation
DeCS
Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeTécnicas e Procedimentos Diagnósticos
Projetos de Pesquisa Epidemiológica
Simulação por Computador
Compartir