Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/34873
Type
ArticleCopyright
Open access
Embargo date
2020-02-19
Collections
- ENSP - Artigos de Periódicos [2294]
- ICICT - Artigos de Periódicos [1365]
- INI - Artigos de Periódicos [3392]
Metadata
Show full item record
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSES AND CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF CLINICAL PREDICTION RULES FOR PULMONARY TUBERCULOSIS IN HOSPITALS
Author
Affilliation
Federal University Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Laboratório de Epidemiologia Clínica. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sérgio Arouca. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Laboratório de Epidemiologia Clínica. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Medical School. Thoracic Diseases Institute. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Laboratório de Epidemiologia Clínica. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sérgio Arouca. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas. Laboratório de Epidemiologia Clínica. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Medical School. Thoracic Diseases Institute. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically review studies evaluating clinical prediction rules (CPRs) for adult inpatients suspected to have pulmonary tuberculosis. Design: Systematic review with meta-analyses. Setting: Hospitals. Patients: Inpatients at least 15 years of age admitted to acute care. Methods: A search was conducted in 5 indexed electronic databases with no language or year of publication restrictions. We performed a meta-analysis for those CPRs with at least 2 validation studies. Results were reported according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Results: Of the 461 abstracts selected, 36 articles were fully analyzed and 11 articles were included, yielding 8 CPRs derived in 4 countries. Broad validation studies were identified for 2 CPRs. The most frequent clinical predictors were fever and weight loss. All CPRs included chest imaging signs. Most CPRs were derived in countries with a low prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis and included homeless, immigrants, and those who reacted to the purified protein derivative test. Both of the CPRs derived in countries with a high prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis strongly relied on chest radiograph predictors. Accuracy of the different CPRs was high (area under receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.79–0.91). Meta-analysis of 4 validation studies for Wisnivesky´s CPR indicates optimistic pooled results: sensitivity, 94.1% (95% CI, 89.7%–96.7%); negative likelihood ratio, 0.22 (95% CI, 0.12–0.40). Conclusion: On the basis of a critical appraisal of the 2 best validated CPRs, the presence of weight loss and/or fever in inpatients warrants obtaining a chest radiograph, regardless of the presence of productive cough. If the chest radiograph is abnormal, the patient should be placed in isolation until more specific test results are available. Validation in different settings is required to maximize external generalization of existing CPRs.
Share